Talk:Bangerz/GA1
Add topicLatest comment: 12 years ago by (CA)Giacobbe in topic GA Review
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Mr. Gonna Change My Name Forever (talk · contribs) 00:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC) Hi, I'm Gonna. I forgot to create this page as I read this Bangerz article, but I did so after reading it. This is my sixth GAN review.
Here are the issues I find in this article:
- No references in the lead (if any).
- The entirety of this article (especially tone, grammar, and prose) needs a copyedit from the Guild of Copy Editors (GoCE).
- It reads like a biased news article.
- Please don't rely heavily on primary sources.
- "Legacy" is unnecessary.
- I see incomplete references.
- Sometimes the article has incorrect formatting.
The result is just a quickfail. Mr*|(60nna) 00:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment – Being on a non-biased observer of this article, it seems like this may need a second opinion, for numerous reasons:
- A) A lead is NEVER to have references in it, which should come as basic knowledge to every Wikipedia editor
- B) The article is well written, only simple errors that can be addressed in the GA review itself.
- C) The "Legacy" is non-existent, unless you are referring to the "Impact" section, in which is well sourced and justifiable.
- A quick fail on this seems unreasonable, so I would suggest re nominating this for a second opinion. Giacobbe talk 00:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)