Talk:Backbiting
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Backbiting article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
"To backbite" is not a verb (at least in English usage), even tho it has the form of the progressive mode (grammar), and a less naive or more thoughtful editor would not have fallen into that cognitive pitfall. Yes, it could have been, and might in the future become, a verb, via backformation, but i trust my 72 years of exposure to the language that tell me it's not yet one. And to the point, defining it as if the putative infinitive were a reality rather than a (trivial) howler amounts to an effort to invent more logic than actually exists in the rough-and-tumble (note this other agrammatical etymology, which does not stem from the nominative freak usages "ball lands in the rough" or "a diamond in the rough" -- nor yet at all from "ruffing the Last Trump") of language language evolution.
--Jerzy•t 08:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- "Backbite" is recognised as a verb by the OED which gives examples dating back many centuries; for example:
To backbite an enemy is sin; how much more to back-bite one's own yoke-fellow.
— John Wesley, Husbands and Wives (1811)
- "Backbite" is recognised as a verb by the OED which gives examples dating back many centuries; for example: