Talk:Baby fever
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incomplete Article / False Information
[edit]This article contains false information, as the current evidence suggests baby fever is not especially prevalent in women. The sources are not up to academic standards and the article contains almost no content. 2601:87:8200:5010:FC63:2746:B38D:CDB4 (talk) 18:42, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Requesting stub status.
[edit]The current atricle is laughably short. I kinda was astonished it hasn't been marked stub yet, since you can't really get anything from the article's existence other than that the phenomena exists. ~2026-26055-66 (talk) 09:38, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Nominate for deletion?
[edit]I won't claim it's impossible to expand this, but someone tried and the article has nevertheless been whittled down to two sentences, which are so vague that they might just be doing more harm than good. Perhaps Wiktionary is better fit to describe what "Baby Fever" is (Cloudcuckoolander already took care of that part 11 years ago, somewhat relevantly they also marked the term "slang, humorous or derogatory" which seems fair to me, but I'm not a native speaker) Cross961 (talk) 18:07, 27 September 2026 (UTC)