Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Axle track

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Peter Horn in topic Axle track#Rail

Title of this page

[edit]

I think this page should perhaps be called "Track (automotive)", as in the automotive field it is not referred to as "axle track" but simply "track". The only reason I have initally gone with "Axle track" is that was the term used on the Track disambiguation page. Thoughts? Erelyes (talk) 07:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good idea - I will reply on your talk page. Trafford09 (talk) 08:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I dont really agree to the 'automotive' move. All vehicles, be they cars, trucks, buses, three wheeled motorbikes, tuk-tuks, mobility scooters, etc, etc, - will have an axle, and therefore an axle track! 78.32.143.113 (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Only vehicles with two wheels on the same axles can have a track, that would include tricycles, other two axle three wheeled vehicles and single axle trailers but exclude bicycles . The article Track (automobile) already exists. The merged article should perhaps be called Track (vehicle). All vehcles with at least two axles have a wheelbase. So single axle trailers do not have a wheelbase. Peter Horn User talk 22:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
The title is OK as is. Peter Horn User talk 23:30, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
With hindsight, I think that 'axle track' is better than 'track (automotive)'. Not all wheeled objects are automotive - e.g. push-trolleys at supermarkets - but they still have axles and hence axle track(s).
Therefore, I now think that the article's title should remain 'axle track' as it is now. Trafford09 (talk) 00:14, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ah - I now see that the proposed merge is to a very similar article. The argument for merging seems good. However, it's a shame that my example of a supermarket trolley is also probably not a 'vehicle' as such. Could one think of a noun which comprises vehicles and push-trolleys .... or am I being inadvertently petty? What about calling the merged article "Track (axle)" (or indeed "Axle track" as this one's now called)? Trafford09 (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
It would apply to shopping carts, wagons, dollies, any vehicle that has either two or more wheels on an axle or a wheel on each side of the vehicle without the wheels being on the same axle. Any vehicle that either has two or more axles, one after the other, also has a wheelbase. I would sugest Track (vehicle axle) Peter Horn User talk 01:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
To make things more interesting there is also an article called Tracked vehicle Peter Horn User talk 01:25, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Not to "forget" continuous track and by the way, shopping carts, etc. have casters rather than wheels. Peter Horn User talk 23:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Wheel track might be more appropriate. Peter Horn User talk 02:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Axle track#Rail

[edit]

@MSGJ:
The section Axle track#Rail merits the {{rail-stub}}
Peter Horn User talk 22:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply