Talk:Auticon

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Auticon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141218212518/http://auticon.de/enterprise/faqs/ to http://auticon.de/enterprise/faqs/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141025232020/http://www.socialventurefund.com/eng/social_enterprises_portfolio/investment_example_auticon/ to http://www.socialventurefund.com/eng/social_enterprises_portfolio/investment_example_auticon/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150105133610/http://www.bitkom.org/de/presse/81149_80867.aspx to http://www.bitkom.org/de/presse/81149_80867.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Auticon-logo-2023.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Edit request: update lead/history/business model + awards/recognitions using new sources

I have a conflict of interest as I work for auticon and am requesting an independent editor to review and apply the proposed updates.

Proposed updated text is in my sandbox:

• User:MillHouseMo/sandbox

Summary of changes:

• Rewrites lead and History for neutrality and clarity, adds independent sourcing (LSE Press case study, BBC, Wired, Consulting.ca, Ferd).
• Updates Business model section, replacing older/unclear stats with clearly-attributed figures from the 2024 Impact Report press release.
• Splits Awards and Recognitions and adds recent items with organiser / reputable sources.

Please let me know if you’d like the changes split into smaller edits. MillHouseMo (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done. I've revised and implemented this from your sandbox.
Notes: Draft consensus is that awards should be notable enough for their own independent articles, especially for companies. Subsequently the awards section has been clipped. (Also, a company's stylisation choice doesn't dictate their capitalisation. Just a nitpick.) FMRadio :3_{(chat | edits | she/her)} 20:22, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Request to review/remove maintenance tags (primary sources / closely associated sources)

Hello — I’m requesting a fresh review of the maintenance tags currently shown at the top of this article (''relies excessively on primary sources'' and ''sources too closely associated with the subject'', both dated July 2025).

Over the past week the article has been substantially rewritten to address these concerns. The rewrite:

* reduces reliance on auticon-owned pages for core claims;

* adds and uses independent, secondary sources for key sections (e.g. LSE Press case study, BBC, Wired, Consulting.ca, Ferd, award organisers);

* keeps any company-reported figures clearly attributed as such; and

* removes or tones down wording that could be read as promotional.

An experienced editor reviewed the changes last week and the updated sourcing was checked at that time.

Could an uninvolved editor please reassess whether the July 2025 tags are still applicable, and remove them if the issues have been resolved? If anything still needs improvement to meet the standard for tag removal, I’m happy to work on further adjustments in my sandbox and/or via an edit request.

(Disclosure: I have a connection to the subject, so I’m posting this request on the talk page rather than removing templates myself.)

Thank you. ~2026-34218-4 (talk) 09:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)