Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Attorney General of New York

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 24 November 2025

Taking office

[edit]

Did Cuomo (and the rest) really take office the day after election day? This seems implausible on its face. The new governor doesn't take office until January 1. john k 06:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well observed, John. I fixed this now. The official list at the site confuses the election date with the date of taking office after 1847. It becomes evident at the resignation of Levi S. Chatfield on December 8, 1853, when Ogden Hoffman had been elected already on November 8, but was NOT YET in office. Besides, Cuomo is shown on the NYAG site on a picture taking the oath on January 1, 2007. Kraxler (talk) 19:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Where's the Article?

[edit]

This article is just a list. Where is the article on the New York state attorney general? Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The official name of this position is "Attorney General of New York".

[edit]

The official name of this position is "Attorney General of New York". It is common for people to say "New York Attorney General" which is fine but the official name is "Attorney General of New York". The Independent Greek 100 (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 13 February 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) SkyWarrior 03:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


New York Attorney GeneralAttorney General of New York – Opening this discussion procedurally given the recent copy/paste move and PRODing of the other page in attempt to move it by NewYorkRepub100. This has also been mentioned by an editor above, but since it appears other states follow the State Attorney general format, I would consider any move to be controversial and in need of discussion. I am neutral as to the outcome here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 24 November 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:32, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply


Attorney General of New YorkNew York Attorney GeneralWP:COMMONNAME estar8806 (talk) 04:44, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Manner of speech" means it is casually used in a running phrase usually preceding a personal name, e.g. "New York Attorney General Letitia James" much like "US President Donald Trump". Article title should be the stand-alone office, not part of a phrase with a personal name. Your ngram hits are just picking up partial phrases, and just from recent news cycles. I'd be more comfortable if you had proposed "New York State Attorney General", but this is a historical article that covers the office before New York was a state. "Attorney General of New York" is clear, fitting and sufficient. Walrasiad (talk) 19:16, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oppose per above; this is not really a necessary change. Thanks, Glasspalace (talk | contribs) 11:50, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.