Talk:Athenidelphax
Add topicLatest comment: 6 months ago by Chess enjoyer in topic Proposed merge of Athenidelphax kennedyae into Athenidelphax
 | The content of Athenidelphax kennedyae was merged into Athenidelphax on 22 January 2026. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Only one source
[edit]I have used only one source, as this is the only published literature on this genus (as of writing this). TheLivingDanish1 (talk) 13:51, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Why is the species page not the same as the genus page if there is only one species?
[edit]I did not connect them, as this is a very new genus with lots of potential to gain new species in the future. This would cause difficulties if they were just one page. TheLivingDanish1 (talk) 13:54, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Proposed merge of Athenidelphax kennedyae into Athenidelphax
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was merge, as all participants agreed. I'd also like to remind everyone that a merge discussion can be closed by anyone if consensus emerges. Chess enjoyer (talk) 03:27, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA William Avery (talk) 14:17, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Merge, per the guideline cited by the nominator. This should be uncontroversial. I left a notice on the article creator's talk page. Since they created both articles, I suggest this discussion be closed early if they agree as well. Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:31, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hello, I see that you suggest a merge, which I am fine with. I have never merged articles before, so I kindly suggest you take the lead on this one. Naturally, I will gladly edit the article so the relevant information from both articles becomes pleasingly connected. I have saved both articles in a Word-document, so you can complete the merge at any time. TheLivingDanish1 (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.