Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Arresting gear

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by 173.28.93.51 in topic AAG not covered

Pic

[edit]

I think you are right. Maybe you can get a free picture of a military object like an arrester gear? I am looking for such a picture but this may take quite some time Jeff 11:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

This is a request to add another external link to this page. An external link to an OEM of Aircraft Arrester Systems: www.scama.se 195.178.182.72 (talk) 08:07, 25 January 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.178.182.72 (talk) 09:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Barricade - Added contradiction notice regarding the amount and spacing of the vertical straps.

[edit]

I know next to nothing about the barricades used on aircraft carriers, but I can clearly see that it does not consist of "[f]ive vertical engaging straps, spaced 20 feet apart". If noone can correct or clarify this I'd suggest rewriting the passage to be less specific. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.137.37.118 (talk) 23:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

AAG not covered

[edit]

The Ford-class carriers' Advanced Arresting Gear is now 7 years overdue from functional, after more than a half billion dollars spent on it: http://www.dailypress.com/news/military/dp-nws-carrier-arresting-gear-report-20160708-story.html with McCain calling for the Navy to replace it with something else. The Ford-class carriers article AAG section links to the stub Advanced Arresting Gear article but not this one, without noting the controversy. Merging the stub with this article, including a redirect would start fixing the omission. - 173.28.93.51 (talk) 17:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply