Talk:Archie Morris

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Archie Morris redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Chicago

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago

Television: ER Low‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the ER task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Is this necessary?

Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is the line "Fulfilling the adage of those who don't do, teach" really necessary here? I ask since I am not an avid viewer of ER and am unsure if there's some backstory to the comment. If there isn't, it seems superfluous, and I will remove it. Ericfassbender 16:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's one of the reasons the article supposedly "lacks a formal tone." The whole thing is a bit too glib for the editors' taste, probably. Cranston Lamont 21:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

WP:DEPROD

This page was proposed for deletion by Aguyintobooks (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment:
No sources for over 8 years!
It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 16 September 2017 with the comment:
Unsourced is not a valid WP:DEL-REASON. WP:NOTCLEANUP. WP:NODEADLINES.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Is this necessary?

WP:DEPROD