Talk:Aphria (fly)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move 11 January 2018

Latest comment: 8 years ago7 comments7 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: #1 – moved, #2 – no consensus. See strong consensus to qualify the genus, and no agreement to make the company the primary topic; however, that may change as the company gains significance in the long term. This decision will result in a disambiguation page at the Aphria title, where Aphria longirostris will be included under the genus. Happy Publishing! (closed by page mover) Paine Ellsworth ^put'r there 15:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Aphria → Aphria (genus)Aphria (genus)
Aphria (company) → Aphria

Searching for "aphria" on Google, I don't get a single result on the fly genus, only the company. Even searching for "aphria fly" only yields wiki-results+pages about the company. The number of pageviews for Aphria Inc. (1206/30 days) is larger than that for this page (356), even though Aphria Inc. was deleted for part of the last 30 days. Mparrault (talk) 16:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Support Company appears to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. —Xezbeth (talk) 07:55, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support first, oppose second The company is highly WP:RECENT. PT1 and PT2 are split here and a TWODAB solution would be better. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:30, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. There is no way that the company can be currently considered primary topic according to long term significance. A two-way DAB is not ideal but might be acceptable; Moving the company to the base name is not. Andrewa (talk) 07:09, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
NEUTRAL: Weak support (kinda neutral) first, neutral second. I sorta agree with Ictu on this one. Although I'm pretty neutral (while kinda supporting) the first move, I'm extremely neutral on the second. I'm unsure about Aphria's longterm significance, and I don't know enough to weigh in with a full-on opinion. Paintspot Infez (talk) 19:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Requested move 11 January 2018