Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Antiderivative (complex analysis)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 82.23.81.76 in topic Holomorphic antiderivative

How about a list?

[edit]

How about a simple list of the antiderivative conditions? --35.8.231.15 (|talk) 2 May 2007

That would belong in the article on complex antiderivative conditions, wouldn't it?--Cronholm144 06:25, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Edit proposal

[edit]

May I propose the following edit (essentially pedagogical, some students have asked for it, otherwise it should be explictly said that we are identifing each constant function with its value)?

"The derivative of a constant function is the zero function. Therefore, any constant function is an antiderivative of the zero function. If is a connected set, then the constant functions are the only antiderivatives of the zero function. Otherwise, a function is an antiderivative of the zero function if and only if it is constant on each connected component of (those constants need not be equal)."  Preceding unsigned comment added by Algebraonly (talkcontribs) 08:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I made the change. In the future, don't be shy! Your contributions are welcome here! Ozob (talk) 00:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Nothing. Just pinging the OP @Algebraonly: to make them aware of the Ozob's message above. :) --CiaPan (talk) 08:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Holomorphic antiderivative

[edit]

In the definition of f it needn't be holomorphic. However, in the existence article it seems that in the sentence "In fact, holomorphy is characterized by having an antiderivative locally, that is, g is holomorphic if for every z in its domain, there is some neighborhood U of z such that f has an antiderivative on U." this is assumed. Otherwise take an f which is not harmonic, then won't be holomorphic.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.23.81.76 (talk) 14:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply