Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Anthozoa/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 04:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply


Comments by Dunkleosteus77

[edit]
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • "strengthened by calcareous and other materials," I think "calcerous" is an adjective, so I'd say replace it with "calcium carbonate"
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • In the Diversity section, it sounds like the Octocorallia and Hexacorallia have already been discussed, but they haven't yet. Generally I like to put the phylogeny first to bring up all the broad overview stuff, and then move on into more specific branches later   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  04:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
The wikilinking business is difficult. I have removed some links that were duplicates and added some where the terms first appeared, but I have left some like "taxon" and "taxa", "symbiosis" and "symbiotic", "Antipatharia" and "black coral", and in the tables because I think they are needed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
I can't complete it because Google Books is restricting which pages I can access. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Because it is an important order of stony corals and is mentioned in the classification given above. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
But why is it more important than all the other Paleozoic anthozoans?   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  17:34, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Well the classification in the "Phylogeny" section is referenced to WoRMS and that recognises Rugosa as a valid taxon but not Tabulata or Heliolitida. I will remove "Rugosa" if you like. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
No it's fine, I was just wondering   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  19:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • ref no. 32 has a doi 10.1017/S1089332600000073
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • you might want to be consistent on how you form the access dates (like choose between 24-7-17 and 24 July 2017)
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
I didn't know what to do about that so I replaced the image. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply