Talk:Ancient Heart

Album chart

Could this article list the position the album got into in the album charts of the countries listed?Vorbee (talk) 06:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Done! It may need further work so feel free to improve on it (or anyone else reading this). --Geach (talk) 17:57, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

How album got its name

How did this album get its name? I think it was from a phrase used in Cathedral Song. Vorbee (talk) 18:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

This has been added. Paul Charles wrote in one of his books that it was his suggestion, but I haven't seen Tikaram or anyone else verify that. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:56, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ancient Heart/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 18:48, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Dragonhawk12 (talk · contribs) 00:25, 3 October 2026 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear, concise and understandable to an appropriately broad audience, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, list incorporation and table accessibility:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   Spot check here

   @BennyOnTheLoose: The spot check is above. There are some sources that don't have links, and I assume those are physical media. Please send the pages to me through my email or Discord at dragonhawk12. Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 00:36, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

   Sure, I will do that in the morning. Do you just want the ones listed in the Spot Check table? Evans (1992) is on archive.org Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:47, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

   Earwig's highest percentage was a 25% due to proper names and quotes. No copyvio here.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

   Article is stable

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, have suitable captions, and have alt text:

   Images have sufficient licenses and captions.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Hello! I'll be reviewing this article for the GA October backlog drive and for WiG's 10th editathon. If you have any questions or I biff anything, please tell me! Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 00:25, 3 October 2026 (UTC)