Talk:Anamniotes
Add topicLatest comment: 3 months ago by Cantthinkofanyusername in topic Why are amniotes listed under "Cladistically included but traditionally excluded taxa"?
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Nucleated red blood cells
[edit]Loss of nucleus in red blood cells is a characteristic of mammals, and not of amniotes. This item in the list should be deleted.Teaktl17 (talk) 21:05, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- No input, the list item removed. Teaktl17 (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Why are amniotes listed under "Cladistically included but traditionally excluded taxa"?
[edit]Amniotes cannot be anamniotes, anamniotes are purely paraphyletic and cannot be redefinable as monophyletic to cladistically include amniotes Cantthinkofanyusername (talk) 06:02, 1 April 2026 (UTC)