Talk:Americium
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Bgsu98 in topic GA Reassessment
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Americium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article contains a translation of Americium from de.wikipedia. |
Pronunciation?
[edit]No explanation of the correct pronunciation. This would be a useful addition!
Article review
[edit]It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and noticed uncited statements, especially in the "Isotopes" section. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:52, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Issues have been resolved Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:44, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
Uncited statements, especially in the "Isotopes" section. Z1720 (talk) 01:40, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- I'll take a look. If you could mark uncited statements with {{cn}}, that would be helpful for me. — hike395 (talk) 16:07, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Hike395: I have added citation needed tags to the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:44, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- I see some possible ENGVAR mixing. The article is tagged {{Use dmy dates}}, and that's what seems to be used in the body. That's British(ish). But the article is consistent with US "color" and "neighbor" types of spellings. DMacks (talk) 02:37, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- MOS:DATETIES explicitly says that date format is independent of the national variety of English. Element articles are broad enough IMO that this topic is not so strongly American, so using DMY is fine. 1brianm7 (talk) 07:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- Interesting. Thanks! DMacks (talk) 15:06, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- MOS:DATETIES explicitly says that date format is independent of the national variety of English. Element articles are broad enough IMO that this topic is not so strongly American, so using DMY is fine. 1brianm7 (talk) 07:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
@Z1720: Adding references for all of the {{cn}} you've added. — hike395 (talk) 14:10, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep. Citation concerns resolved. Z1720 (talk) 15:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- GA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Physical sciences
- GA-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- GA-Class chemical elements articles
- Mid-importance chemical elements articles
- WikiProject Elements articles
- GA-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- GA-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Mid-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- GA-Class University of California articles
- High-importance University of California articles
- WikiProject University of California articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- Pages translated from German Wikipedia
