Talk:AllBusiness.com

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 February 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Untitled

Latest comment: 19 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

This article conforms to the notability guidelines:

From Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works, the source of which is both:

independent of the company, corporation, organization or group itself, or of the product's or service's manufacturer or vendor, and
reliable.

There is coverage from the NY Times, a weekly column in the San Francisco Chronicle, CNet, a rather in-depth article from Business Journal, ClickZ, and AdWeek. I would have added more but it would have cluttered up the page. Let me know if you would like more sources. Monkeythumpa 20:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I was using improper citations. I cleaned it up and added a rather lengthy Danny Sullivan article about the company and it's importance. Monkeythumpa 20:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

It seems like someone randomly deleted items so I reverted it. Let me know if there is a problem with the reverted copy.Monkeythumpa 22:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fixed typo Monkeythumpa 19:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Untitled