Talk:Alien Spidy

Infobox and image

@Sven Manguard: I'm aware that you don't like utilizing copyrighted images (although I think it's unlikely that this game will pass GAN without any), but is there a reason there's no infobox? Tezero (talk) 23:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm not convinced that they are particularly useful in situations where everything that would be in the infobox is also in the lead, but I have added one anyways. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:38, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

...and now there's an image. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Reception

I'd kill PS3 and PC from the GameRankings section of {{vg reviews}}. It isn't an aggregate view if there are only one or two reviews calculated. czar ♔ 12:31, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

I moved it down to the notes section, putting it in additional context. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alien Spidy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Secret (talk · contribs) 19:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Reviewing... Secret ^account 19:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

No close paraphrasing concerns, prose is fine, sources are reliable and matches the information. Passing. Secret ^account 19:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)