Talk:Algorithmic game theory

Game theory Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Game theory. We need your help! Join in \| Fix a red link \| Add content \| Weigh inGame theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Game theoryTemplate:WikiProject Game theorygame theory
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article needs at least one example. I have little idea how the "input", the "algorithm," and the "output" all relate to each other from reading this article. Out of frustration, I would like to strangle whoever wrote this fuzz. 128.151.39.158 (talk) 19:25, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Rename

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Shouldn't this be named **Game-Theoretic Algorithm Design**? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.205.158.7 (talk) 04:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think that what you're referring to is algorithmic mechanism design. My understanding is that algorithmic game theory is more general as it also includes a computational POV of purely game-theoretic questions, such as the computational-complexity criticism of the Nash equilibrium concept. --Aviad.rubinstein (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Untitled

Rename