Talk:Al-Ruways
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Problem in the 1945 data.
[edit]I thought United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine, A/AC.25/Com.Tech/7/Add.1 and Hadawi were based on the same numbers??
However, looking at just one page (p. 41) in Hadawi, and comparing it with the UN-data, gives totally different data:
(Hadawi first number (for “Arabs”), UN second number (total for “non-Jewish”):
- Mi'ilya: 900 vs. 430
- Nahf: 1,320 vs. 770
- Sajur: 350 vs 1,690
- Sakhnin: 2,600 vs 330
- Sha'ab: 1,740 vs 350
- Sumata: 1,130 vs 2,600
- Umm al-Faraj: 800 vs 3,830
- Tamra: 1,830 vs 1,130
How is this explained? Huldra (talk) 20:07, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ignore the html text; it is badly scrambled. Use the PDF file at the bottom of the page. Here. Zerotalk 09:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Whaw, somebody really messed up that html text, thanks for the PDF file-link, Huldra (talk) 21:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Is Al-Ruways actually the Crusader Careblier??
[edit]Khalidi, 1992 writes that Al-Ruways is Crusader Careblier, and it looks as this agrees with Clermont-Ganneau(?)
However, Conder, 1890, p. 35 seem to suggest el Khureibeh on Mount Carmel. That is still on SWP map 5. It was noted by Guerin, 1875, p. 249, and SWP I:322 ("ruins of a village, destroyed by Ibrahim Pasha") And Bronstein, 2005, p. 46 refers to a Tel el Charruba as the Careblier mentioned in 1266. Can there be more than one Careblier? See also R.H.C. p. 133, Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)