Talk:Ai-Da
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ai-Da article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2020 and 14 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shmalice lastname.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Spoof / con trick srticle
[edit]It's doesn't take much research into this article to conclude that is is part of a web of thinly veiled con-tricks created by (Redacted). 81.154.4.27 (talk) 02:47, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- So let's see the wp:reliable sources that say so since your personal opinion is not enough. (Your comment was potentially libellous so I have edited it.) --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 10:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
"The world’s first ultra-realistic humanoid robot artist"
[edit]There have been multiple edits made over the lifetime of this page to put this catchphrase at the very beginning of the first sentence of the page, removing "(...) is described by its creator as" or any other introduction. The phrase is used heavily in Ai-Da promotional material, including their official website. While this does describe what Ai-Da is, I think a more generic lead-in sentence like in this older version of the article better introduces the topic (and also isn't copied straight from Ai-Da ad copy). Does anyone else agree or disagree? Android field (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes I agree. Especially as I wrote that preamble first time round. So I will now put it back: if anyone has an independent RS that supports the claim with evidence, it can come out again. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- This was added back to the article as a Guardian quote, but I think the journalist is just echoing the creator. The Guardian article introduces Meller as
the force behind Ai-Da, the world's first ultra-realistic robot artist
, where the Ai-Da website usesworld's first ultra-realistic artist robot
. - I'm not sure what earlier artist robot example they're trying to distinguish it from by adding ultra-realistic (Maillardet's automaton? Jaquet-Droz automata? Norman White's Menage?), but it seems rather arbitrary. If no source has actually written in detail about which developments are unique to Ai-Da, we shouldn't rely on fragments of press coverage for it. Belbury (talk) 16:33, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
- This was added back to the article as a Guardian quote, but I think the journalist is just echoing the creator. The Guardian article introduces Meller as
Promotional content
[edit]Several edits were made by User:Viytc471, who I blocked for promotional editing. Their edit summaries give me an LLM vibe as well. The current version may need to be checked for neutrality and factuality (I see somebody already tagged it). ASUKITE 15:59, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
I've also now tagged the article for COI issues; Viytc471 didn't respond to the COI concerns raised on their talk page. They had added some promotional language to this article, removed details about some of the robot's work being human-assisted (, ) and described several of the photos of the robot that they uploaded as having been taken personally. Belbury (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2026 (UTC)