Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Ahmed Issa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 months ago by History6042 in topic GA review

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 00:09, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • Source:
5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 43 past nominations.

Arconning (talk) 03:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC).Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Ahmed Issa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Arconning (talk · contribs) 15:22, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 12:32, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'll do this one. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:32, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@History6042 Updates? Arconning (talk) 12:48, 29 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Apologies, I have been quite busy recently and have not had time to do this, I should be able to get to it on Saturday or Sunday. I cannot do it today as my computer mouse has broken and I don’t know how to do a review of mobile. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:17, 29 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Just got my mouse so can start tomorrow as I am about to go to bed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:20, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Comments

[edit]

First comments coming soon. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:32, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Image review: History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:49, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Is under copyright but has a fair use rationale. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:49, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
The rationale seems good. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:50, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Stability is fine. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:53, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Neutrality is all good. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:35, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Is his exact death date known? History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:57, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Nope Arconning (talk) 13:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Not too detailed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:57, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Grammar/prose review. History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:39, 13 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "and had ran in a time of 3:47.8" -> "and ran in a time of 3:47.8"
  • "Chadian national record" -> "a Chadian national record"
History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:40, 13 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Source spotcheck. I will do sources 1a, 4, and 10. History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:41, 13 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • 1a - Fail, it says nothing about Thonon-les-Bains in the source.
  • 4 - Fail, it doesn't say anything about the date it happened only the date of newspaper publication.
  • 10 - Pass.
History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:51, 13 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
@History6042 Have done all of the needed changes. Arconning (talk) 14:13, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
@History6042 Any updates? Arconning (talk) 02:53, 23 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Pass, sorry, I did not see that you fixed the prose issues. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:27, 27 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.