Talk:Adi-Buddha
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by Uanfala in topic Mahadeva?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Adi-Buddha/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| It is incorrect to apply the term "demiurgic" to adi-buddha. Demiurge has negative connotations. The primordial buddha is clearly a blissful entity. Let terms like these be applyed to where they belong (gnosticism and greek philosophy). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.9.138.244 (talk) 22:37, 4 September 2011 (UTC) |
Last edited at 22:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 06:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Mahadeva?
[edit]The disambiguation page at Mahadeva lists this article as one of the meanings of the term "Mahadeva". Is this correct: is Adi-Buddha ever referred to using that term? – Uanfala (talk) 20:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)