Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Addison P. Jones

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) in topic Tombstone

Tombstone

[edit]

The reason you gave for moving the tombstone image was a WP:IMAGE LEAD which states: "For most topics, the selection of a lead image is plainly obvious: a photograph or artistic work of a person, photographs of a city, or a cover of a book or album, to name a few." It does not ban tombstone images from the infobox. I would agree that a drawing of the person or a photograph would be much better, but it seems silly to move the image to below the box based on your interpretation of WP:IMAGE LEAD. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 04:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

A tombstone image for a person in the infobox is inappropriate. It can be used within the body, but it is a vast misrepresentation of the person. --MASEM (t) 04:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
I quote from Talk:Stephen H. Wendover - "putting an image of the gravestone in the image box is nothing short of preposterous, and I will have no further comment on that point..." by User Bbb23. WP:IMAGE LEAD certainly bans tombstones from the infobox of persons. It requires a depiction of the person. Kraxler (talk) 15:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
While consensus is against it and I respect that, you still are not quoting the guideline which reads: "the selection of a lead image is plainly obvious: a photograph or artistic work of a person". It does not demand an image of the person. Just quoting "of the person" is not helpful at all and deceptive. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Reply