Talk:Adam Neely

Untitled

Other Musical Project with primary involvement: https://insideoutsidemusic.bandcamp.com/ . Probably worth mentioning. --2001:480:91:FF00:0:0:0:15 (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Sources to use, not already used

• https://www.bimm.co.uk/news/bimm-podcast-ep8/
• https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/scotts-bass-lessons/the-scotts-bass-lessons-podcast/e/56359567
• https://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/c0d15053-c14f-4a0e-a62f-47766dd7f914
• https://www.musical-u.com/learn/the-power-of-curiosity-with-adam-neely/

JohnCastle (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC) I've added references to all but the bbc link which just refers to other pages.

Use of comparison to Vsauce

I'm not sure the phrase "His channel...has been described by several commentators as the 'musical Vsauce'." adds a whole lot to the introduction. Sure, it's useful if you know who Vsauce is and are familiar with his content, but I feel like it might confuse more people than it helps. It might be more helpful to describe his actual video format than to simply do a one-off comparison.

Additionally, I looked through the three sources for that sentence, but I can't seem to find that specific phrase anywhere. If my guess is correct, the "several commentators" the article refers to are YouTube comments—using YouTube comments as sources on a Wikipedia article seems a little contentious, to say the least.

Space Moths (talk) 02:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Space Moths, very valid point. I think I'll rephrase this now. Ed6767 talk! 02:06, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Remaining issues

The article still claims to have multiple issues. Is this still true? If so, what needs addressing? JohnCastle (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC) I tried to upload a photo a Adam Neely under fair use, despite stating it was low res and cropped to be used purely for identification, it was removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnCastle (talk • contribs)

I tagged it for deletion since it fails NFCC criterion #1 - the image is potentially replaceable with a free version since the subject is still alive. Ionmars10 (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Name Change

Hello! Sorry about the name change, I do apologize. I will read up on the rules and regulations before hand! Again, I apologize. Gongfong2021 (talk) 01:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for correcting my edits!

I don't always make the most pristine edits, so thank you for everyone who takes the time and fixes my mistakes! I appreciate it greatly! Gongfong2021 (talk) 16:23, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Acousmana

@Acousmana You're right about the revert. I'll try to see if there are impartial sources. JohnDVandevert (talk) 10:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Relation to composer Blake Neely

Adam is NOT related to Blake Neely. This may be worth including in the document. Source: https://youtube.com/v/zUbYcMtTbHE?t=799 -96.235.24.46 (talk) 20:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Adam Neely/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk · contribs) 00:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 08:54, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:54, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

• Images appropriately licensed
• Earwig reports 18%
• Duplicate links for bass guitar and vlog

• Removed the bass guitar link. Kept the vlog link: MOS:RELINK says "Do not re-link in other sections if not contextually important there," and I think it counts "contextually important".

• He told the magazine Spin that his video topics were, "the stuff I get excited about", rather than what is covered in music education. What does this have to do with cite 19?

• Should've been the Spin citation, fixed.

• Spot checked cites 3, 11, 16, 26
• Got a 404 on cite 28

• Added archive link.

• Nicely done--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Sturmvogel 66: I have addressed all your comments. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 03:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)