Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Accelerated Evolution

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Metalicat in topic Peer review
Featured articleAccelerated Evolution is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed
June 14, 2026Peer reviewReviewed
July 21, 2026Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Accelerated Evolution/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello. I'll be reviewing this article for GA. Check back for my analysis. Timmeh!(review me) 22:53, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Checklist and analysis

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The release section seems a bit short. Have any singles been released for this album? If so, how have they done on music charts? Has the album itself appeared on any major charts? Has the Devin Townsend Band toured in support of the album, and where have they done so?
    OK, I added some information. There were no singles (Townsend's only released one single in his career) and as an independent album it didn't sell very well, although it had a minor appearance on the charts in France. —Gendralman (talk) 23:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Unanimous praise? Really? Is there not one reviewer that had anything negative to say about the album, even within a generally positive review?
    They didn't intend it literally, I'm sure, but I see your point about NPOV. I kept the source but adjusted the wording. —Gendralman (talk) 23:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I'll wait for my questions to be answered before taking any further action. Timmeh!(review me) 22:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
    I've passed the article, as my concerns have been addressed. Thanks for quickly responding, and good luck with this and other articles in the future. Timmeh!(review me) 23:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Accelerated Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accelerated Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accelerated Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accelerated Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Peer review

[edit]

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm looking to nominate this article to FAC. Any comments are appreciated.

Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 21:48, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Comments from Noleander

[edit]
  • I'm not a musician or music fan, but I'll do my best to provide some feedback.
  • "They cited that the album blended different genres of ..." word "cited" doesn't sound right. Not sure what word is better: maybe check other music articles for ideas? "Observed", "noted", "remarked", "commented", "stated" ?
  • "Accelerated Evolution was released on 31 March 2003[11] on Townsend's independent label, HevyDevy Records. It is distributed in Canada ... " WP:CITEFOOT and MOS:REFPUNCT say that footnotes mid-sentence should generally be avoided, unless there is a compelling reason not to. Suggest move the [11] cite to after the period.
  • " He utilized clean vocals much more than in his previous albums,..." Consider adding a few words there constrasting/describing the vocal style of the prior albums.
  • Image "Devin Townsend Accelerated Evolution cover.jpg" is copyrighted, but it has correct fair-use justification, and is low-resolution, and is in WP (not Commons), and is used in only 1 article. check
  • Image "File:Devin Townsend.jpg" - has good licensing info.check
  • I ran the "Show Ref Check" tool, does not show any issues with citations.
  • Source title capitalization: article uses both title case & sentence case e.g. "Symphony X to Tour with the Devin Townsend Band" vs "Even the most bizarre and ingenious of his ideas seem to hit the target": The Devin Townsend albums you should listen to... and one to avoid". WP:CITEVAR says to use one or the other (for all titles of a specific class of source) and ignore how source capitalizes itself.
There is a tool that will convert all source titles to same captlz style: User:ZKang123/TitleCaseConverter. Noleander (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • This has double quotes within double quotes: ""Even the most bizarre and ingenious of his ideas seem to hit the target": The Devin Townsend albums you should listen to... and one to avoid" Should be single quotes within double quotes.
  • I ran Earwig Copyright Violation tool: It reported no issues.
  • First sentence: "Accelerated Evolution is the sixth studio album by Canadian musician Devin Townsend, released in 2003." The "... released in 2003" does not scan well. Could probably ignore it anywhere else in the article, but you don't want to alarm reviewers in the very 1st sentence. Consider "Accelerated Evolution, released in 2003, is the sixth studio album by Canadian musician Devin Townsend." Or "Accelerated Evolution is the sixth studio album by Canadian musician Devin Townsend." and put release year in next sentence.
  • Better word? "... was Townsend's first dedicated lineup for his solo material, ..." Is there another word besides "dedicated" that more precisely tells the readers what the sources are trying to convey. I'm not sure if that means the group had a name? or they were a semi-permanent grouping (vs disbanded after the album)? etc.
  • Colloquial: "... a nod to the frantic pace ..." "a nod to" is vulgar/colloquial. Sentences in the encyclopedia's voice should use a more formal/professional wording.
  • Explain? "Accelerated Evolution was written to be a polar opposite of SYL." Readers will wonder "polar opposite of what, specifically?" The tone of SYL? The production values? The profit margin? The instrumentation? If it is referring to the musical tone/character: then it should explain the tone/character of SYL. (Alternatively: if the character of SYL is described above in the same major section, no need to repeat it here).
  • "Credits adapted from Accelerated Evolution album liner notes." "adapted" is an unexpected word here. Readers might wonder if it indicates something fishy: did the article editor take some creative liberties? Can the word be eliminated?
  • That's all I have. After the prose is made a bit more professional, should have no problem getting promoted to FAC, because it is relatively small, has typical RS quality for music articles, and has no contentious material. Fine article! Noleander (talk) 03:29, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Metalicat

[edit]

Some comments from a non-specialist; metal is well outside my listening and my editing patch, so treat these as prose, MoS, and internal-consistency points only.

  • The first sentence now reads Accelerated Evolution is the sixth studio album by The Devin Townsend Band, but the body says it was the band's first album, and the infobox chronology places it in Townsend's solo sequence. I suspect this crept in with the recent rephrasing of the opening sentence: it is Townsend's sixth studio album and the band's first. Something like Accelerated Evolution is the sixth studio album by Canadian musician Devin Townsend, and the first recorded with his backing group The Devin Townsend Band would square the lead with the body.
  • Date formats are mixed and there is no date-format template to police them. In the prose, the lead has March 31, 2003 while the Release section has released on 31 March 2003; in the citations, publication dates mix mdy and dmy, and access dates run to three styles (mdy, dmy, and ISO), occasionally within a single reference. MOS:DATEUNIFY will come up at FAC. Adding {{Use mdy dates}} (or dmy, your choice) auto-formats every CS1 date, so a manual sweep would only be needed for the prose and the few hand-written references the template cannot touch.
  • Both images lack alt text: the infobox |alt= is empty and the Townsend photograph has none.
  • SYL first appears in the body as a large musical contrast from SYL without the abbreviation ever being introduced; the Background section calls it Strapping Young Lad's self-titled album. Adjacent to Noleander's point about that sentence: could the abbreviation be established at first mention, e.g. self-titled album (SYL), so the Music section's uses are anchored? While there, contrast from would read more naturally as contrast with.
  • The recording studios (The Armoury, Merchland and Hipposonic studios) appear only in the infobox and nowhere in the body. Infobox-only facts tend to draw queries; a sentence in Background or Release citing the liner notes would cover it. Is "Merchland" the spelling the booklet uses?
  • Townsend performed guitar, vocals, and production: "performed" cannot govern "production". Perhaps Townsend played guitar, sang, and produced or handled guitar, vocals, and production.
  • Two tense questions. It is distributed in Canada by HevyDevy, in Japan by Sony, and in Europe and North America by InsideOut states 2003 distribution arrangements in the present tense; unless a current source supports them, past tense is safer. Conversely the lead's The album, written and produced by Townsend, was a mix of musical styles describes the work itself, which takes the present: is a mix.
  • The distributor is spelled both InsideOut (Release) and Inside Out Music (Track listing); one form throughout would be tidier.
  • A question rather than a point: the lead does not mention the chart placings or the touring that followed release. Both are short sections, but MOS:LEAD expects the lead to touch every major section; a single sentence would do it.

A tight little article and an enjoyable read even for someone who has never knowingly heard a note of it. Happy to look again before FAC if useful. Metalicat (talk) 16:37, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply