Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Absorbing element

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jochen Burghardt in topic Further generalization

Absorbing elements for multiary operations

[edit]

For a nullary operation on a set X, which is just an element x of X, all elements of X are considered to be absorbing elements, regardless of whether they are equal to x.

For a unary operation f, an absorbing element is simply a fixed point of f.

In general, an absorbing element for a multiary operation and a position i is an element x of X such that applying the operation gives x whenever the element in the ith position is x. An absorbing element is an element of X that is an absorbing element for every position. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:08, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Absorbing element. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Further generalization

[edit]

Why does the result of a product with the absorbing element have to be equal to the absorbing element? If for example we observe (or perhaps with just left or right but not both), for some , this is effectively an absorbing element too, yes? 50.35.103.217 (talk) 00:23, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

This might be a good idea. However, wikipedia requires it (per WP:OR) to be published elsewhere before it can be mentioned here. So if you find a reference, feel free to add a section here, called e.g. "Generalized absorbing elements". - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply