Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abortion in Alabama article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women's health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red projectin 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
When I was reading this article, I found that it was worded quite poorly and unprofessionally. While its information seems to be correct (if not somewhat outdated and contradictory), I don't think it meets Wikipedia's quality standards. For example, the headers of some sections are written in all caps when I that's not the standards for Wikipedia. Hope this helps improve the article.
Thedualcitizen (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I was thinking of removing the section called "women's abortion experience." It doesn't seem to add to the article in any meaningful way and the only way it could was if it was entirely re-done with more of a broad focus featuring statistics and such.
Thedualcitizen (talk) 18:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I wouldn’t say that it “doesn’t seem to add to the article in any meaningful way”. It’s an interesting story that corroborates statements made elsewhere in the article while adding something to the article that the other sections don’t. And there’s a different section for statistics (you know, the one called Statistics). VictimOfEntropy (talk) 02:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 23 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Maryajimenez, AsapVirgo. Peer reviewers: Mfarbelaez, Claudiadatnow, NSCintron.