Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:APX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by 217.132.179.156 in topic Inapproximable problems

APX-complete, APX-hard

[edit]

This description introduces the word 'complete' in the APX context without explaining it, then launches into a new paragraph that opens with APX-hard, then refers to the unexplained APX-complete to contrast APX-hard in an extremely difficult-to-follow fashion. Please somebody who has a clue what this is about, explain APX complete and then make the way APX-complete is used to explain APX-hard clearer. 71.141.225.199 16:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I guess I just assumed that anyone studying an advanced topic in complexity theory would already be familiar with completeness and hardness. I can expand on this. Deco 16:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
I've explained in more detail the definitions of APX-hard, APX-complete, and written an article on PTAS reductions. Hope this helps. Deco 00:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Max SNP

[edit]

(How) Does APX relate to Papadimitriou and Yannakakis's "Max SNP"? I couldn't find an entry for Max SNP and thought this might mention it. Thanks LachlanA 21:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Great question. See this blog entry for answers. I'll leave the question of how to incorporate this into Wikipedia up to future consideration. Dcoetzee 22:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Inapproximable problems

[edit]

Are there problems in NPO which do not belong in APX?

If P=NP, is APX=NPO? 217.132.179.156 (talk) 21:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply