Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:AN/FLR-9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by TadgStirkland401 in topic "Advances in technology"

Photo

[edit]

Does anybody have a good wikipediable image for this type of antenna, please? --Shaddack 02:57, 21 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Original research

[edit]

This is a strange statement: It is not known how many antennae remain in existence. Of course, it is known. You just have to go and look, these structures are, after all, large enough to be visble from far away. To do some frowned-upon "orginal research": The structure near Augsburg is still standing according to my collegue who saw it yesterday while looking out of the window of an intercity train (and asked for my opinion what it was, what then made us find this article). Simon A. 15:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

rename

[edit]

this needs renamed to its proper standard nominclature AN/FLR-9Brian in denver (talk) 03:13, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

When were these built?

[edit]

This seems to be one missing bit of data. Something more specific than "Cold War era"?--NapoliRoma (talk) 06:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Locations

[edit]

Why are not the Elephant Cages at NSGA Skaggs Island (CA) and NSGA Hanza (Okinawa) not listed? I've personally seen both. Perhaps they were not FLR-9s but they were elephant cages. FRD-10?

NSGA = Naval Security Group Activity.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbryant 94560 (talkcontribs) 03:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AN/FLR-9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

"Advances in technology"

[edit]

How about a link to what those advances are? Surely that is not THAT secret. KHarbaugh (talk) 13:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Just guessing but, with new reliance on satcom for global communication, HF radio comms for worldwide command and control has far surpassed that old tech. But that is just one of many “advanced” technologies. Do we really need to delineate them all? — TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 22:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
I misspoke. Satcom is one that has far surpassed HF comms. — TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 22:57, 16 January 2025 (UTC)Reply