Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:AMD FX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 142.114.243.19 in topic FX-8150 Incorrect Price

Discontinuation date

[edit]

Why does atricle state FX-8350 was discontinued March 1, 2017? I have one produced in week 30 of 2018. https://imgur.com/a/A9qEhMB  Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.232.111.3 (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

“Native 8-core”

[edit]

In the opening paragraph, this article mentions “AMD FX was a series of high-end AMD microprocessors for personal computers which debuted in 2011, claimed as AMD's first native 8-core desktop processor,” but the actual claim AMD makes is more expansive. In the “menu” box under the heading“Innovative Architecture”, they state the AMD-FX series has “\[t\]he industry's first and only native 8-core desktop processor” (the sales copy doesn't specify which model). Bhbuehler (talk) 19:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

My apologies. I expected a preview when I hit “publish.” Anyway, this claim seems looks to me to be more specific than it sounds. Clearly it wasn't updated after 2011 to account for new x86-64 processors. There seem to have been some intel Xeon (server) processors with 8 physical cores. More than that though, it relies on the meaning of “native” (I am assuming physical rather than hyperthreaded, but I couldn't find where/if AMD defined the term). It also seems like the claim is something relevant to mention in §Controversy, but not having read up on it and having spent more time than I intended trying to figure out some of this, I must move on. Bhbuehler (talk) 20:37, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

FX-8150 Incorrect Price

[edit]

Under the history section, the launch price of the FX-8150 is billed as $185 with two citations. Both citations still work but they both say it was $245, not $185. The only reference to the 185 number is from citation 11, but is referencing a later price cut to the 8120, not the 8150. 142.114.243.19 (talk) 02:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply