Talk:AGESA

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AGESA article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Unnamed section

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Okay, what does world+dog want to see on this topic, what is needed. I am a non-NDA Agesa reverse engineering expert Twobombs (talk) 10:08, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

nda or not, most components are considered trade secrets and thus not allowed on wikipedia but anything that is general knowledge is okay. Markthemac (talk) 02:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

An insight into the bizarre numbering system would be useful. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 16:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

I just wrote a bit in an attempt to shed some light on that. It took me a while but I finally made some sense out of it. --uKER (talk) 02:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Open source?

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

seems to be open sourcecode in coreboot. Whats happened here? Would be good to expand. 188.220.243.64 (talk) 21:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

New version

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I read about the release of AMD Combo PI version 1.0.0.4 Patch B (SMU v46.54)^[1]. Should this be added to the article. Because of this, I'm also confused by the version numbering. Because the version is now again a 1.0.0.4 version, while there were already 1.0.0.6 versions. Jan Vlug (talk) 12:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

AMD always resets the version numbers for the different AGESA iterations, currently its Combo-PI and previous version was Pinnacle-PI. --Denniss (talk) 13:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

References