Talk:A7 medium tank

"A" prefix

what does the prefix A mean? 2804:18:484E:A08:1:0:EFDD:9794 (talk) 03:32, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Medium Tank A7E1.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Medium Tank A7E1.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 22 February 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 05:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

---

• A7 Medium Tank → A7 medium tank
• CLB 75 Tank → CLB 75 tank
• T27 Armored Car → T27 armored car
• WZ-111 Heavy Tank → WZ-111 heavy tank

– Per WP:MILMOS and WP:LOWERCASE. WP:MILMOS#Capitalization – "When using numerical model designation, the word following the designation should be left uncapitalized (for example, 'M16 rifle' or 'M109 howitzer') unless it is a proper noun.". Also for consistency. Please note the related RMs at Talk:T1 Light Tank#Requested move 19 February 2024 and Talk:Heavy Tank M6#Requested move 21 February 2024. Note that there is a cut-paste move in the history of T27 Armored Car and T27 armored car. However, if I understand correctly, there is no need to request a histmerge because only one editor had contributed to the article up to the time after the cut-paste move. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 05:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Military history has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

• Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
• Support: BarrelProof's statement above is quite convincing. SchreiberBike | ⌨  15:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
• Support per above. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 19:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
• Support per nom. Schierbecker (talk) 20:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
• Support per nom. Convincing argument. Cinderella157 (talk) 09:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.