Talk:4seven
Add topicLatest comment: 7 years ago by JE98 in topic Requested move 27 September 2018
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 4seven article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Requested move 23 April 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. No explanation why the current title supposedly violates MOS:TM. Jenks24 (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
4seven → 4Seven – It is better to put the "S" in capitals. 2A02:C7D:564B:D300:53:1401:C606:AD58 (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - How is it "better"? What WP policy guideline would this come fall under? Since the channel is styled as '4seven'. -- AxG / ✉ / 10 years of editing 18:53, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per above -- Please explain how it is better and cite Wikipedia policy. Thank you! CookieMonster755 (talk) 19:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I see no reason to move the page to 4Seven with a capital "S". Their own website uses lower case. Meatsgains (talk) 02:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- I have a reason why this page should be moved to 4Seven with a capital S. Because I do not want to violate MOS:TM. If this article won't be moved, we would be stuck violating MOS:TM! 2A02:C7D:564B:D300:3893:70DD:5B3D:42AA (talk) 16:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- We should really move this page to 4Seven with a capital S. 2A02:C7D:564B:D300:3893:70DD:5B3D:42AA (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 27 September 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Closed JE98 (talk) 19:24, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
4seven → 47 (TV channel) – If we rename this article, we can have a display title for 47 as 47, this way the article can be properly named in the header. JE98 (talk) 12:35, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose What sources support the channel being called '47' or '47'? When they do call it '4seven'. -- AxG / ✉ 13:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class British television articles
- Low-importance British television articles
- British television task force articles
- Start-Class Television stations articles
- Low-importance Television stations articles
- Television stations task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles