Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:2026 Chico library shooting

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 days ago by Cameron Dewe in topic Wikipedia is not a news website
icon
Important notice: Accusations of committing a crime
This article may contain material about living persons who have been accused of committing a crime. Editors must seriously consider not including any material which suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been secured (see WP:BLPCRIME). Please edit carefully.

Wikipedia is not a news website

[edit]

Wikipedia is not a news website. How is this article encyclopedic? - Cameron Dewe (talk) 00:31, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I think it is too soon to tell whether or not this event is encyclopedic, but that there is potential due to interest regarding the suspect's motive. An article like this, I give it a bit to breathe, and if it doesn't pass the notability test after a certain amount of time, I nominate it for deletion. Raskuly 🐰 06:20, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
While I agree it may be too soon to say how notable this event is, at present it is little more than a news story. What I am seeking from the contributors to this article is some sort of rationale for having this article now, at the early stages of the story, before any trial of the perpetrator has taken place. Comparing it to the article about the Clovis library shooting, I am wondering if there is a trend in the US for libraries becoming a popular crime scenes for seemingly random shootings of unrelated people, just like educational institutions , places of worship, shopping malls and other places where crowds gather. While I am not nominating this article for deletion, yet, I am wondering how much time to give this article for improvement. After all, it took about eighteen months to reach a verdict in the Clovis case, so we are probably talking in terms of years, not just months, for the justice system to reach a verdict about this shooting. Up to then is just news, without some deeper reason for being considered an encyclopedic article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 06:57, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I think it would become clear well before the trial of the suspect to determine if this meets the notability guidelines for events. Raskuly 🐰 06:59, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Good. I await developments. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 07:05, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
not sure if a reply by myself pings everyone above; I don't live in USA but I am personal friends with one of the family of one of the victims (Cody Hull); the family has been upset by the wrong information that has made it into the early version of the article. The earliest editions which others commented on above, have their primary material being from the initial news releases. And so, the article was very vulnerable to early reporting errors, ergo the inaccurate name "Jacob Hull" and misidentification of the individual who was shot at the entrance.
So, toward a verifiable online encyclopedic public-knowledge goal, with newer sources, and with High Respect for the victims, I edited a few things.
Removed is the piecemeal detail of reloading, and minor notes on the third injured individual.
Presently and in the future it contributes to the history of Columbine copycats, and it would still be beneficial for general knowledge for people in the region to have more accurate and aggregated/verified info, as well as give better access to knowledge of the innocent people. I have opted-in to permanently watch this article.
Just my two cents. Tomacpace (talk) 19:55, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yes, your reply pings everyone who has subscribed to the discussion. Thanks for updating the article, and correcting wrong information, too. In my opinion, it is probably too soon to have this as a live article and I would still welcome an answer to my question and have someone explain why Wikipedia should have this article. After all, Wikipedia is not for hosting news stories, nor is it a memorial website. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 07:47, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply