Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:2012 NBL All-Star Game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Number 57 in topic Requested move

Rename

[edit]

Moved the article to 2012 based on the game as named on the NBL website. And 2012/13 would still be wrong. Wikipedia uses – not a /. Refer 2012–13 NBL season. Past wikipedia practices is not an excuse for poor and/or incorrect editing. If necessary fix the previous articles. --Falcadore (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved Number 57 19:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply



2012 NBL All-Star Game → 2012–13 NBL All-Star Game – This game was played in December 2012 under 2012–13 NBL season. The all-star game's name must be fit to the season's name. 2004–05 NBL All-Star Game in January 2005, 2006–07 NBL All-Star Game in November 2006 corresponded with their seasons respectively. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 10:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC) Sawol (talk) 10:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

I tend to agree with you, but I'm personally not going to argue this because User:Falcadore does raise the point of the NBL themselves officially naming this event the 2012 NBL All-Star Game per here. Also per what Falcadore stated in terms of past wikipedia practices, just because the 2004–05 NBL season's All-Star game was previously under the name of 2004/05 NBL All-Star Game, doesn't mean the 2012–13 season's game has to be. DaHuzyBru (talk) 10:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Reject: Moving to the nominated alternative title fails Precision component of article WP:NAMINGCRITERIA. We don't invent terminology here. If the game was called 2012 All Star game then that is what the article is called. That the season is called something else is not relevant. --Falcadore (talk) 13:12, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
No, 2012–13 NBL All-Star Game is sufficiently precise. 2012 NBL All-Star Game is pretty confusing whether it is the all-star game of 2011–12 NBL season or 2012–13 NBL season. Sawol (talk) 02:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
I know what you mean i.e. in the infobox for Chris Goulding for example, I have put [[2012 NBL All-Star Game|2013]] to symbolise the 2012–13 season, because if done like [[2012 NBL All-Star Game|2012]], it would seem like he was a 2011–12 All-Star if compared to the NBA or European leagues (not many leagues have All-Star games before the new year). It's a tough one, and it comes down to personal opinion – there's no real correct answer here. DaHuzyBru (talk) 03:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
No, that is not what Precision is about. You are advocating a name you have invented. That is just plain wrong. Where is the source backing the move? --Falcadore (talk) 06:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have never invented any terminology. As you say Wikipedia uses – not / in date ranges. Likewise, Wikipedia fits the related articles' names including all-star game to the season's name. Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's official name. Although official names 2014/15 Season and 2012 All-Star Game are used, Wikipedia has selected 2014–15 NBL season and 2012–13 NBL All-Star Game. You are reminded of encyclopedic expression. Sawol (talk) 09:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
And you are reminded that 2012 NBL All-Star Game was the official name of the event and you are advocating circumventing that because the season article name does not match. IMO that is not sufficient reason. --Falcadore (talk) 14:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.