Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:2004 Istanbul restaurant attack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Paris1127 in topic Proposed move

Comments

[edit]

Was it a Jewish masonic lodge - or just a masonic lodge? Secretlondon 23:13, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)

No mention of Jewish in the external link. Secretlondon 23:18, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Also it was a restaurant (frequented by Freemasons) and not a Masonic lodge --Decumanus 23:20, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I wrote the page and would like to talk just made a screen name djkra. how do i talk on this page?

I was wrong in saying that it was a jewish lodge. I found this online.

Many Jewish businessmen and intellectuals are believed to belong to Turkey's five masonic organizations, which have some 14,000 members.

Reason for title namechange - it was too darn long, not to mention silly. -SV(talk) 19:54, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC) Bold text

How could both this attack and the Madrid train bombings be 911 days after 9/11? There must be a mistake in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.14.65.122 (talk) 19:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed move

[edit]

I propose to move this article to March 9, 2004 attack on Istanbul restaurant (changing 'of' to 'on') in accordance with normal English usage. Are there any other considerations before I proceed? --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 10:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

In the absence of dissent I'm going ahead with the move. Per WP:NAMINGCRITERIA the new name accords with the requirement of 'naturalness', which is lacking in the old title March 9, 2004 attack of Istanbul restaurant. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 10:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I would suggest moving it to something like 2004 Istanbul restaurant attack, which is much more natural than the current title. I realize this is many years after the previous move, but the current title is a mess. Paris1127 (talk) 17:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply