Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I think there is a double entry here:
1274 BC, July - The Battle of Kadesh in Syria. //
1274 BC - sign the earliest known peace treaty at the end of the Battle of Kadesh. //
1269 BC - Ramses II, king of ancient Egypt, and Hattusilis III, king of the Hittites, sign the earliest known peace treaty. //
The middle entry for the peace treaty probably needs to be taken out, it seems it refers to the same treaty that was signed in 1269BC; or double-check the dates to see which one is correct.
68.164.218.1615:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Book of Genesis in the bible is not historical. Citation 13 and 14 are invalid
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Looking up (footnote 13) ISBN 978-2-13-081069-8 and (footnote 14) 978-2-7495-2074-2 does not return any results. The statement mentioned regarding: the Semitic tribe first assumes the historicity of the book of Genesis from Abraham to the Jacob's 12 sons are valid. The statements made there are all non-factual, using "may" for facts. e.g.: "Jacob's group of descendants of Aramaic origin *may* have left the region of Harran..." have no historical basis. The entire bullet should be struck out. Dccheung6789 (talk) 21:57, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
