Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Subobject

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a subobject of an object in a category is a monomorphism into , “up to isomorphism”. In various categories of mathematical structures, this coincides with the standard notion of a substructure of the given type of structure. For example, subobjects correspond to subsets in the category of sets, to subgroups in the category of groups, to subrings in the category of rings, etc.[1]

The dual concept to a subobject is a quotient object. This generalizes concepts such as quotient sets, quotient groups, quotient rings, etc.

Definitions

[edit]

Let be an object of a category . The monomorphisms into are equipped with a canonical preorder: for and , we put when factors through , i.e., there exists such that . When this is the case, is unique because is a monomorphism, and is also a monomorphism because is.

This preorder gives rise to an equivalence relation , namely, when and . When this holds, the unique morphism such that and the unique morphism such that are isomorphisms inverse to each other (by uniqueness of the factorizations , ).

The subobjects of are defined by quotienting monomorphisms into by this equivalence relation. This means that a subobject is represented by a monomorphism into , with the provision that two such monomorphisms which factor through each other are considered equal as subobjects. The subobjects are equipped with the partial order induced by the preorder on monomorphisms into .

The collection of subobjects of an object may in fact be a proper class. If the subobject collection of every object is a set, the category is called well-powered (or, rarely, locally small,[citation needed] but this clashes with a different usage of the term locally small, namely that the morphisms between any two objects form a set).

If has pullbacks, then a morphism gives rise to an order-preserving map from subobjects of to subobjects of , defined at the level of representing monomorphisms by pulling back along .[a] If is additionally well-powered, this gives rise to a subobject functor .[2]

The concept of a quotient object is formally dual: a quotient object of is an epimorphism from , with the provision that two such epimorphisms which factor through each other are considered equal as quotient objects.

Examples

[edit]

In the category of sets, the monomorphisms are the injective functions. Given a subset , the inclusion map defines a subobject, and every subobject is of this form because two monomorphisms into are equivalent if and only if they have the same image. The subobject functor is the contravariant powerset functor , which sends a set to its power set partially ordered by inclusion, and sends a function to the function that maps a subset to its inverse image .

There are many other categories where subobjects correspond to a standard notion, for instance:

Likewise,

A subobject of a terminal object is called a subterminal object.

Properties

[edit]
  • There is always a greatest subobject of , represented by the identity morphism .
  • In an elementary topos, the poset of subobjects of any object is a Heyting algebra.

Regular subobjects

[edit]

A regular subobject is a subobject represented by a regular monomorphism, namely a morphism (automatically a monomorphism) which arises as the equalizer of two parallel morphisms. Dually, a regular quotient object is represented by a regular epimorphism, namely a coequalizer of two parallel morphisms.

In some categories, the categorical notion of subobject does not concord with the usual notion whereas the categorical notion of regular subobject does. For example, in the category of rings, the inclusion is an epimorphism but is not the quotient ring of by an ideal, whereas regular subobjects correspond to quotient rings.

Another example is the category of topological spaces, where regular subobjects of correspond to subspaces of because the regular monomorphisms are the subspace embeddings, whereas the monomorphisms are all injective continuous functions, and so subobjects of correspond to subsets of with a topology refining the subspace topology. Similarly, regular quotient objects of correspond to quotient spaces of whereas quotient objects in general correspond to quotient sets of with a topology coarser than the quotient topology.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. It can be checked by diagram chasing that a pullback of a monomorphism is a monomorphism, that pullbacks of equivalent monomorphisms are equivalent, and that this respects the order.

Citations

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • Mac Lane, Saunders (1998), Categories for the Working Mathematician, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 5 (2nd ed.), New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-98403-8, Zbl 0906.18001
  • Mac Lane, Saunders; Moerdijk, Ieke (1994). Sheaves in Geometry and Logic. Universitext. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0927-0. ISBN 978-0-387-97710-2.
  • Pedicchio, Maria Cristina; Tholen, Walter, eds. (2004). Categorical foundations. Special topics in order, topology, algebra, and sheaf theory. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications. Vol. 97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-83414-7. Zbl 1034.18001.