Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Name calling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name-calling is a form of argument in which insulting or demeaning labels are directed at an individual or group. This phenomenon is studied by a variety of academic disciplines such as anthropology, child psychology, and political science. It is also studied in rhetoric and a variety of other disciplines.

In politics and public opinion

[edit]

Politicians sometimes resort to name-calling during political campaigns or public events with the intentions of gaining advantage over, or defending themselves from, an opponent or critic. Often such name-calling takes the form of labelling an opponent as an unreliable and untrustworthy source, such as use of the term "flip-flopper".

Common misconceptions

[edit]

Gratuitous verbal abuse or "name-calling" is not on its own an example of the abusive argumentum ad hominem logical fallacy.[1][2][3][4][5] The fallacy occurs only if personal attacks are employed to devalue a speaker's argument by attacking the speaker; personal insults in the middle of an otherwise sound argument are not fallacious ad hominem attacks.

References

[edit]
  1. "The Ad Hominem Fallacy Fallacy". Plover.net. Archived from the original on 2013-08-14. Retrieved 2013-07-27.
  2. "Logical Fallacy: Argumentum ad Hominem". Fallacyfiles.org. Retrieved 2013-07-27.
  3. Ad hominem fallacy Archived 2013-07-19 at the Wayback Machine, Logical Fallacies, Formal and Informal, Independent Individualist.
  4. "AdHominem". Drury.edu. Archived from the original on 2013-08-18. Retrieved 2013-07-27.
  5. "Logical Fallacies» Ad Hominem (Personal Attack)". Logicalfallacies.info. Archived from the original on 2015-06-07. Retrieved 2013-07-27.