Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Monetianthus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Monetianthus
Temporal range: Early Cretaceous (Aptian-Albian) [1]
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Order: Nymphaeales
Family: Nymphaeaceae
Genus: †Monetianthus
Friis et al.[2]
Species:
†M. mirus
Binomial name
†Monetianthus mirus
Friis et al.[2]

Monetianthus mirus was a species of fossil plant, which occurred in the early Cretaceous period of Portugal.[1]

Description

[edit]

Generative characteristics

[edit]

Monetianthus mirus had small, bisexual, actinomorphic flowers with 9-10 tepals. The androecium consists of 20 stamens. The pollen grains are monocolpate and reticulate. The gynoecium consists of 12 syncarpous carpels. The ovules are anatropous.[1]

Taxonomy

[edit]

Publication

[edit]

It was published by Else Marie Friis, Kaj Raunsgaard Pedersen, Maria von Balthazar, Guido W. Grimm, and Peter Robert Crane in 2009.[1]

Type specimen

[edit]

The type specimen was collected in Vale de Agua in western Portugal.[1]

Position within Nymphaeales

[edit]

It is placed in the family Nymphaeaceae.[2] Alternatively, it has been proposed to include this genus in a newly described family Monetianthaceae Doweld.[3]

Etymology

[edit]

The generic name Monetianthus honours Claude Monet. The specific epithet mirus, from the Latin mirus, means wonderful, remarkable, or extraordinary.[1]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Friis, E. M., Pedersen, K. R., von Balthazar, M., Grimm, G. W., & Crane, P. R. (2009). "Monetianthus mirus gen. et sp. nov., a nymphaealean flower from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal." International Journal of Plant Sciences, 170(8), 1086-1101.
  2. 1 2 3 Fossilworks: Monetianthus mirus. (n.d.). Retrieved February 4, 2024, from https://paleobiodb.org/classic/checkTaxonInfo?taxon_no=207951
  3. ↑ Doweld A.B. 2022. New names of fossil Nymphaeaceae and allied forms. Geophytology 52(1&2): 1–28.