Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Male captus bene detentus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Male captus, bene detentus (wrongly captured, properly detained) is a legal doctrine, according to which the fact that a person may have been wrongly or unfairly arrested, will not prejudice a rightful detention or trial under due process.

Practice

[edit]

There is state practice in support of the doctrine,[1][2][3][4] as well as contrary state practice.[5][6][7][8][9] In one of its cases the U.S. Supreme Court held that where a person from another country is apprehended by irregular means, the right to set up as defense the unlawful manner by which he was brought to a court belongs "to the Government from whose territory he was wrongfully taken".[10]

Further reading

[edit]
  • Paulussen, C. Y. M. (2010): Male Captus Bene Detentus? Surrendering suspects to the International Criminal Court. Intersentia. ISBN 978-94-000-0100-8

Notes

[edit]
  1. Attorney-General v. Eichmann, 36 I.L.R. 5 (1961)
  2. Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519 (1952)
  3. United States ex el Lujan v. Gengler, 510 F.2d 62 (1975)
  4. United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992)
  5. State v. Ebrahim, 21 I.L.M. 888
  6. United States v. Toscanino, 500 F.2d 267 (1974)
  7. United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez 939 F.2d 1341 (1990)
  8. Connelly v. Director of Public Prosecutions, A.C. 1254 (1964)
  9. Bennett v. Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court, 3 All E.R. 138 (1993)
  10. Ker v. Illinois, 119 U.S. 436 (1886), recently quoted by Office of Legal Counsel, Memo on Venezuela Maduro capture, December 23, 2025, p. 18.