Draft talk:Teamscale
Add topic | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
COI
[edit] | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
Fstreitel (talk) 13:45, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Note that I am working for the company that makes the tool discussed in this draft article. I believe that the subject has enough notability to deserve an article, but naturally I am very biased.
The main sources of notability are: the iX article, the ESE journal article, the IEEE International Conference on Technical Debt paper, the Automated Software Engineering paper, all written by people not employed by CQSE.
Furthermore, many research papers exist that discuss or make use of Teamscale, but have been co-written by my colleagues. However, they have all been accepted into peer-reviewed journals. Some have been mentioned in the article. I do not know if it is necessary to point out in the article that these papers have been co-written by employees of CQSE; nor how to best do that. This is one of the points that definitely needs outside review. Please let me know if these have to be removed or can stay but need some sort of marking to make it clear that they have been co-written by employees.
I did my best to write as unbiased an article as I could, including also critical points from the various sources. But probably this part also needs critical review.
Regarding the section on features of the software, I oriented myself on other articles, like SonarQube where only the most distinguishing features are discussed. I limited myself to those. Plus then I filtered on those that can also be found in sources outside the product documentation. Again, this probably needs some scrutiny.
Thanks in advance for the review!
Rewritten from scratch by hand
[edit]I rewrote the entire article by hand and shortened it significantly. I did not know using an LLM to correct grammar mistakes was not allowed. This time, it's all my own writing, no LLMs used at all. Sorry for that initial mistake. Fstreitel (talk) 08:11, 17 July 2026 (UTC)