Draft talk:Ornata clade

New review after edits

@Aydoh8 {{ping|Aydoh8}}

Hello ! I do want to apologize to have used an AI to summarize one of my texts in my draft for submission, the part in question (which here was about the history) was hard to understand and I did ask the AI to help summarize the history part. The other parts on the other hand are all written by myself. I totally undestand my error and when re writing it all by myself after, I did see a few errors made by the AI. I will be careful now and not use it again !

Would it be too much to ask you to review my article another time now that I deleted and wrote myself the part where I used AI on the first time ? I totally understand if it would need another person to review. Please just tell me !

Thank you so much for your time,

Colin Gamache Colin Gamache (talk) 07:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Big edit of the page

Hello, this used to be an article on the original group of Calathea ornata described by Helen Kennedy, but i figured it was better to transfer everything and write about the Ornata clade instead because it is much more modern and actually proven by molecular studies. Ornata group = informal and not enough proven and Ornata clade = proven and an actual clade.

I tried as much as possible to write through wikipedia eyes. I tried putting no bias in the work. If you see any or feel it s still too much "my research", feel free to tell me ! I will improve it again.

Thank you for reviewing the page ! Colin Gamache (talk) 07:30, 2 October 2026 (UTC)