Draft talk:Guidde

Contested deletion

I am a paid editor who is connected to the subject, as noted on this page. I am trying my best to remove promotional content to make it appear more neutral. However, I do understand that as an editor connected to the subject, some hints of promotional content might remain. I would appreciate advice on what exactly to remove and how to improve the page. I believe the subject is notable and is backed by reliable references. I still would appreciate advice from experienced editors. I have worked hard on the page and would appreciate it if I could continue to work on it. I do not believe a speedy deletion tag is required, as I have followed all proper guidelines for declaring my COI, and the draft is no longer exclusively promotional. --Bargedinmyroom (talk) 21:01, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Notability

Thank you @MCE89: for the review and for flagging concerns about sourcing.

While the Haaretz article is sponsored and therefore not relied upon for establishing notability, the company’s notability is supported by multiple independent, reliable secondary sources that go beyond routine announcements and provide substantive coverage, in line with WP:GNG.

Specifically:

• TechCrunch (Oct 31, 2023)(https://techcrunch.com/2023/10/31/guiddes-ai-automatically-generates-documentation-videos-for-software/)
• TechCrunch (Feb 19, 2025)(https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/19/guidde-taps-ai-to-help-create-software-training-videos/)

TechCrunch is a major, independent technology newsroom with strong editorial standards. These articles provide in-depth discussion of the company’s product, technology, and market positioning, not merely a funding blurb. As discussed in Noticeboard and Teahouse discussions, TechCrunch articles written by a named author and TC staff are considered reliable secondary sources and may be used to establish notability.

• Calcalist Tech (Hebrew and English editions)

(https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/skufisq9jg) (https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/923yvb6hw)(https://www.tech12.co.il/index-startups/Article-b46f820d2752981026.htm) Calcalist is a well-established Israeli business and technology publication with editorial oversight. These articles provide regional and international coverage of the company’s operations, growth, and product impact.

• MI-3 Australia

(https://www.mi-3.com.au/01-11-2023/guidde-raises-116m-expand-ai-powered-video-documentation-platform) MI-3 is an independent business and technology outlet with editorial review, offering analysis beyond a press release rewrite.

• Tech in Asia

(https://www.techinasia.com/news/israeli-ai-video-startup-guidde-raises-15m-series-a) Tech in Asia is widely accepted as a reliable source across Wikipedia articles and provides independent international coverage.

Taken together, these sources represent significant coverage, across multiple independent publications, over multiple years, in line with GNG. While some articles discuss funding rounds, several also analyze the company’s product, technology, and market role, which exceeds routine announcements.

For these reasons, I believe the draft meets Wikipedia’s notability requirements. Bargedinmyroom (talk) 17:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)