Draft talk:GoMkt
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 5 days ago by Vermelho7 in topic Follow up
| This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Follow up
[edit]Thank you for reviewing my submission. Just to clarify, which of the three criteria does it not meet?
1. Reliable: Wall Street Journal and Economist should qualify, right? 2. Independent: Neither one of the sources above is not connected to the company. 3. With this in mind, I assume there's a question about significance, is that correct? There are a number of other articles that do deep dives on this company. Should I incorporate/cite them here as well? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Vermelho7 (talk) 04:10, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Draft-Class company pages
- NA-importance company pages
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Draft-Class Food and drink pages
- NA-importance Food and drink pages
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- Draft-Class Environment pages
- NA-importance Environment pages
- Draft-Class New York City pages
- NA-importance New York City pages
- WikiProject New York City articles