Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject AI Cleanup, a collaborative effort to clean up artificial intelligence–generated content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AI CleanupWikipedia:WikiProject AI CleanupTemplate:WikiProject AI CleanupAI Cleanup
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@ChrysGalley: Thank you for your very detailed review.
I have reworked totaly the draft on the product/the palteform instead of the company. I agree that it's more appropriate.
You are also right about my BBC comments.
On sourcing, I did look for additional independent coverage and had less success than I expected.
I hope the sources will still be enough.
I find the subject genuinely interesting, and I was surprised that there are not more players.
Any further guidance would be appreciated. Overture (talk) 08:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Overture - Many thanks for this further work, and I suspect you made the right call. I will let another reviewer see this draft through an independent pair of eyes. ChrysGalley (talk) 10:26, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
