Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Draft talk:Agentic software engineering

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Distinction from AI-assisted software development

[edit]

Thanks for reviewing, M kuhner. The distinction is scope and sourcing.

AI-assisted software development covers the broad practice of using AI across the development workflow, sourced largely to industry and general press. Whereas my draft covers a narrower subject: an emerging academic discipline framing agent-based development as an engineering field, with its own foundational model ("SE for Humans and SE for Agents"), an ACM/IEEE workshop at ICSE 2026, and a systematic review in IEEE Access. The sourcing is almost entirely peer-reviewed and doesn't overlap with the parent article.

This also mirrors the existing structure, where vibe coding has a standalone article while being summarized within the parent (a specific concept coexisting with the broader topic). I've added a wikilink to situate this draft the same way.

That said, I'll defer to your judgment: does the distinct scholarly scope warrant a standalone article, or would it be better merged as a potential new section within AI-assisted software development? I'm happy either way.

Drewski720 (talk) 15:57, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

PS another way to think of this:
1. AI-assisted software development treats AI as a tool within an unchanged process.
2. Agentic engineering argues the entire software development lifecycle must restructure around the tool. Drewski720 (talk) 20:02, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
If this distinction can be shown in reliable sources, it can certainly justify a stand-alone article. It can't be an ad-hoc distinction for article purposes, though: ideal would be to find someone making the distinction you just made, in a reliable source. Then you could lead off with a section that clearly distinguishes this concept from AI-assisted development.
(I'll note I have not reviewed this article: I was on the fence, so left a comment instead. Someone else will review it.) M kuhner (talk) 20:48, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply