Draft:Tradify (software)
Submission declined on 4 August 2026 by Avgeekamfot (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 30 October 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
Declined by Pythoncoder 9 months ago.LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. |
Submission declined on 22 October 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Declined by Theroadislong 9 months ago.Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. |
Submission declined on 16 October 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
Declined by Pythoncoder 9 months ago.LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. |
| Type | Subsidiary |
|---|---|
| Industry | Software / SaaS |
| Founded | 2010 |
| Founder | Curtis Bailey |
Area served | Worldwide |
| Parent | The Access Group |
| Website | Official website |
Tradify is a New Zealand-founded technology company that develops job management software for trade and field service businesses.[1] It was founded in 2010 in Auckland by electrician Curtis Bailey. The company’s software has been reported on by New Zealand and international business media in connection with its funding and subsequent acquisition.[2]
History
[edit]Tradify was established in 2010 to develop administrative management software for tradespeople.[1] In March 2021, the company completed a NZ$10 million Series A funding round led by the venture capital firm Movac, with participation from Icehouse Ventures and others. The investment supported expansion into Australia and the United Kingdom.[1]
In October 2024, The Access Group announced its acquisition of Tradify. Reports in New Zealand business media placed the value of the transaction above NZ$100 million.[3][4]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- 1 2 3 "Tradify raises $10m – three reasons behind its sudden boom". The New Zealand Herald. 22 March 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2025.
- ↑ "British software giant set to acquire NZ tech company Tradify". RNZ. 2 October 2024. Retrieved 28 October 2025.
- ↑ "Tradify seals $100m-plus sale to UK software powerhouse". National Business Review. 2 October 2024. Retrieved 28 October 2025.
- ↑ "Access snaps up Tradify in £50m+ deal". AccountingWEB. 2 October 2024. Retrieved 28 October 2025.

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.