Draft:The Today Standard

Submission declined on 9 May 2026 by EatingCarBatteries (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by EatingCarBatteries 4 months ago. Last edited by EatingCarBatteries 4 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guideline, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. Bhargavamakwana (talk) 04:45, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

The Today Standard

The Today Standard is a digital publication and media platform that focuses on the intersection of emerging technologies, public policy, and the societal impacts of artificial intelligence. Established in early 2026, the platform provides deep-dive technical analysis and editorial commentary on software architecture, cloud-native systems, and the legal frameworks surrounding digital transformation

History

The Today Standard was founded to bridge the gap between high-level technical engineering and broader socioeconomic discussions. Since its inception, it has served as a digital repository for technical content strategy, specifically targeting professionals in the software engineering and policy-making sectors.

Key Personnel and Contributors

A core leadership and engineering team drives the platform's technical direction, editorial strategy, and operational growth. Notable key figures include Bhargav Makwana and Shubham Agrawal, who have been instrumental in shaping the publication's standards. Their contributions help maintain the site’s focus on complex systems architecture, ensuring that the content remains both technically rigorous and highly relevant to the modern software engineering community.

References

^[1] ^[2]

[1] ttps://www.linkedin.com/company/thetodaystandard/

[2] ttps://thetodaystandard.com/

[1]

[2]

This page was redesigned at the edge.

The Today Standard

History

Key Personnel and Contributors

References