Draft:Road.cc
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,525 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: I am resubmitting this draft with a focus on high-authority sources.User:krang (talk) 16:45, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | |
Submission declined on 6 March 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by ChrysGalley 4 months ago.
| |
- Comment: This needs some further work on it, in respect of WP:SIRS, so independent sourcing in detail of the publication. Sourcing for the details is OK, but we need more coverage specifically for organisational notability. ChrysGalley (talk) 20:22, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. Krang (talk) 17:12, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Type of site | Cycling news, reviews, and advocacy |
|---|---|
| Available in | English |
| Headquarters | Bath, Somerset, England |
| Owner | Farrelly Atkinson Ltd |
| Editor | Jack Sexty |
| URL | road |
| Launched | March 2008 |
road.cc is a British cycling website based in Bath, Somerset. It was launched in March 2008 by former Future Publishing editors Tony Farrelly and Dave Atkinson as a digital-native alternative to traditional print magazines.[1] The site reports on bicycle technology, professional cycling and road safety, and has been described as "estimable" by The Guardian's Peter Walker.[2]
Media impact
[edit]The publication is frequently cited by UK national media when reporting on cycling safety and traffic law. In 2010, after the Daily Mail published an exposé on Channel 4 News presenter Jon Snow allegedly breaking traffic rules, road.cc provided the platform for Snow's technical rebuttal of the claims, which was subsequently analysed by The Guardian.[3]
Similarly, in 2021, the Evening Standard cited road.cc for its interview with a witness to an angle-grinder bike theft at Surrey Quays, using the site's reporting to provide context for a Metropolitan Police investigation.[4]
In 2024, road.cc published a technical analysis of a Telegraph front-page story regarding cyclist speeds. The analysis demonstrated the newspaper had relied on erroneous GPS data from Strava. The Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) subsequently upheld a ruling against The Daily Telegraph for inaccuracy regarding the article.[5]
References
[edit]- ^ Sexty, Jack (2023-09-04). "road.cc is 15! How it started, how it's going and a few big thank yous". road.cc. Retrieved 2026-05-21.
- ^ Walker, Peter (2015-04-16). "Which party's manifesto is strongest on cycling?". The Guardian. Retrieved 2026-05-21.
- ^ Seaton, Matt (2010-07-26). "Jon Snow should set an example on his bike by not running red lights". The Guardian. Retrieved 2026-05-21.
- ^ Coughlan, Joe (2021-11-09). "Brazen thieves steal £3,500 bike in front of shocked shoppers in daylight in London". Evening Standard. Retrieved 2026-05-21.
- ^ Tobitt, Charlotte (2024-08-08). "Telegraph in IPSO breach with article claiming cyclists were doing 52mph and 'putting lives at risk'". Press Gazette. Retrieved 2026-05-21.
External links
[edit]Category:British websites Category:Cycling websites Category:Online magazines published in the United Kingdom Category:2008 establishments in the United Kingdom
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.